Explicit route formats
Catalog entries identify whether a model uses OpenAI-compatible, Claude Messages or embeddings routes.
A different multi-model operating model
RouterLab is a multi-model API option for teams that want a Swiss-operated product layer, an explicit public catalog, familiar API formats and a documented path for coding agents. Compare the operating model—not only the number of model names.
Your client
App, agent or workflow
RouterLab API
OpenAI-compatible + Claude Messages
https://api.routerlab.ch/v1Start with the protocol. Choose a model family or a client integration only after that.
Understand the connection path first, then choose a model from the live catalog.
Catalog entries identify whether a model uses OpenAI-compatible, Claude Messages or embeddings routes.
RouterLab provides the customer-facing gateway, catalog, key and usage experience from Switzerland.
Use direct custom endpoints for compatible agents or the ScioNos path for Claude Code and Codex CLI.
The right alternative depends on the route formats your software needs, the models actually available to your account, pricing, support, operational location and how clearly upstream processing is documented. RouterLab is strongest when control and a focused product surface matter.
import OpenAI from "openai";
const client = new OpenAI({
apiKey: process.env.ROUTERLAB_API_KEY,
baseURL: "https://api.routerlab.ch/v1",
});
const response = await client.chat.completions.create({
model: "model-id-from-/v1/models",
messages: [{ role: "user", content: "Hello RouterLab" }],
});Start from the workload and client contract, then choose the route.
Choose from routes that RouterLab actively publishes instead of integrating every upstream individually.
Place a Swiss-operated product layer between internal applications and multiple model providers.
Connect custom-endpoint agents directly and use ScioNos for supported terminal clients.
Write down the models, context, tools, route format, residency and support requirements that matter.
Verify model IDs, capabilities and current pricing rather than relying on a static comparison table.
Run one real application or agent flow and compare reliability, output and total operating fit.
Use the live catalog and API documentation as the final source for route availability.
No. Both can provide multi-model access, but the catalog, product layer, operational context, route design and supported workflows differ.
Compare available models, API formats, feature support, pricing, upstream processing, account controls, support and the integration path for your actual clients.
A compatible application can usually begin by changing the base URL, API key and model ID, then validating model-specific behavior with a real workload.